Locu vs RescueTime: Insights vs Action

RescueTime is the pioneer of automatic time tracking. It monitors everything you do on your computer, categorizes it as productive or distracting, and shows you detailed analytics about how you spend your time.

But knowing the problem doesn't fix the problem.

Locu takes the opposite approach: instead of passively monitoring everything, you actively structure your work into focused sessions. Instead of analyzing past behavior, you build better execution patterns by design.

If RescueTime shows you what went wrong, Locu helps you work right.

---

The Fundamental Problem with Passive Tracking

Awareness Without Action

RescueTime's value proposition: "Understand where your time goes." It shows you spent:

• 2.5 hours in Slack (distracting)
• 4.2 hours in VS Code (productive)
• 1.8 hours on Twitter (very distracting)
• 45 minutes on Reddit (very distracting)

Then what?

Most people look at the dashboard, feel guilty, close it, and repeat the same patterns tomorrow. Passive monitoring creates awareness but not behavior change. It's like stepping on a scale daily without changing diet or exercise.

Locu's approach: Active structure that prevents distraction by design. Start focus session = distracting sites blocked, Slack goes DND, one task selected, full context visible. The system guides better execution, not just measures poor execution.

Automatic Isn't Accurate

RescueTime tracks every app and website, but it can't read your mind:

• Is Slack time "distracting" (chatting) or "productive" (coordinating with team)?
• Is browser time "distracting" (Twitter) or "productive" (researching documentation)?
• Is code editor idle time "break" or "thinking"?

You end up manually recategorizing activities to get useful data. It's "automatic" but still requires manual correction to be meaningful.

Locu's approach: You intentionally start sessions and select tasks. The tracking is manual-ish but accurate by definition—you know exactly what you focused on because you chose it. No categorization needed, no recategorization burden.

Categories Are Too Broad

RescueTime shows "4.2 hours productive, 2.3 hours distracting." But what did you actually accomplish? Which tasks? Which projects? Which clients? The categories are too generic for useful insights.

For freelancers: "4.2 productive hours" doesn't help invoice clients. They need: "2 hours on Client A's feature, 1.5 hours on Client B's bug fix."

Locu's approach: Task-connected sessions. Work history shows exactly what you worked on, for which client, with what notes. Export invoice-ready timesheets with meaningful detail.

Privacy Concerns

RescueTime monitors everything: every app, every website, every moment. Some people are comfortable with this. Many aren't.

Even for personal use: Do you want everything tracked? Every website? Every idle minute? Every app switch? For some, it feels like surveillance even when self-imposed.

Locu's approach: Only tracks intentional focus sessions. Start session = working. End session = not working. Clear boundaries. You control what's tracked by choosing when to engage. No background monitoring of your entire digital life.

No Focus Support

RescueTime measures distraction but doesn't prevent it. You see you spent 2 hours on Reddit yesterday—but today, Reddit still works. Nothing blocks it. Nothing protects your focus. You're relying on willpower alone.

Locu's approach: Active distraction blocking during focus sessions. Reddit, Twitter, Slack, distracting sites—all blocked. The system protects your focus, not just measures your failures.

---

Feature Comparison

---

When to Choose RescueTime

✅ You want to understand current time usage patterns
✅ You're comfortable with everything being monitored
✅ You don't need task-level tracking or client billing
✅ You're self-directed enough to change behavior from insights alone
✅ You want extensive analytics and historical trends
✅ You don't need active focus support or session structure
✅ Privacy concerns aren't important to you

RescueTime excels at diagnosis—showing you the problem.

---

When to Choose Locu

✅ You want to build better execution patterns, not just analyze current ones
✅ You need active focus support (blocking, sessions, structure)
✅ You prefer intentional tracking over background surveillance
✅ You need task-level detail for billing or retrospectives
✅ You work in Jira/Linear and need integration
✅ Privacy matters—you want to control what's tracked
✅ You want execution structure, not just awareness

Locu provides treatment—helping you work better by design.

---

The Real Difference: Diagnosis vs Treatment

RescueTime's philosophy: Monitor everything. Categorize it. Show you where time went. Create awareness through data and guilt.

Locu's philosophy: Structure your work intentionally. Sessions + blocking + task focus = better execution by design.

It's like the difference between:

• A diagnostic tool (RescueTime) that shows you're out of shape
• A workout program (Locu) that actually gets you in shape

Both are valuable, but they serve different purposes:

• RescueTime is for understanding your current behavior
• Locu is for building better execution patterns

Most people don't need more awareness of their problems. They need structure to solve them.

---

Common RescueTime Patterns (And Why Locu Works Better)

Pattern: "I look at the dashboard, feel bad, close it"

With RescueTime: Weekly email: "Only 65% productive this week." Check dashboard. See 3 hours on Twitter. Feel guilty. Close tab. Next week: same pattern.

With Locu: Start focus session = Twitter blocked. Can't waste 3 hours even if you wanted to. Structure prevents the problem instead of just documenting it.

Pattern: "The categorization is wrong"

With RescueTime: Slack marked as "very distracting." But you were coordinating with team (productive). Spend time recategorizing. Still not accurate for billing purposes.

With Locu: You select "Coordinate with team on Feature X" task. Work on it in focus session. Time accurately attributed. No categorization needed.

Pattern: "I know the problem, but I still do it"

With RescueTime: Dashboard shows you spend 90 minutes/day on Reddit. You know this. You've known for months. You still do it. Awareness hasn't changed behavior.

With Locu: Reddit blocked during focus sessions. Problem solved through structure, not willpower. Can't access even if you try.

Pattern: "Great analytics, but what do I DO?"

With RescueTime: Beautiful charts showing productivity trends, distraction patterns, peak focus times. Interesting. But what's the actionable next step?

With Locu: No need for analysis paralysis. The action is built in: Plan priorities. Start focus session. Work. Take break. Repeat. Simple daily system.

---

Can You Use Both?

Some people do, but it's usually redundant:

RescueTime tracks: "4 hours in VS Code, 2 hours in Slack, 1 hour in Chrome"
Locu tracks: "3 focused sessions on Feature #1234, 1 session on Bug #567"

RescueTime's data is more granular (every app, every minute) but less meaningful (what did you actually accomplish?).

Locu's data is more actionable (task outcomes) even if less granular (session-level).

Most users find Locu's focused vs unfocused time metric more useful than RescueTime's productivity score. Why? Because it reflects execution quality, not just app categorization.

---

Switching from RescueTime

What you'll keep:

• Awareness that tracking helps improvement
• Data-driven approach to productivity
• Understanding of your focus patterns

What you'll change:

• From passive monitoring → active session structure
• From "analyzing yesterday" → "executing better today"
• From app-level tracking → task-level tracking
• From surveillance feeling → intentional boundaries

What you'll gain:

• Daily planning ritual (clear priorities)
• Focus sessions with active blocking (not just monitoring)
• Task-connected work history (meaningful outcomes)
• Jira/Linear/Slack/Calendar integrations
• Daily shutdown ritual (clear boundaries)
• Actually building better habits through structure

What you might miss:

• Automatic tracking (everything captured automatically)
• Super granular analytics (every app switch, every minute)
• Historical productivity scores and trends
• Background monitoring (no conscious engagement needed)

Migration process:

1. Review final RescueTime reports (understand current patterns)
2. Set up Locu integrations (Jira, Linear, Calendar, Slack)
3. First morning planning (prioritize consciously)
4. First focus session (experience active structure)
5. First evening review (compare task-based vs app-based insights)

Setup time: 15 minutes
Learning curve: 1 week to build intentional session habit

---

Pricing Comparison

RescueTime: Free / $12/month (Premium)
Locu: $12/month or $6/month (Beta discount)

RescueTime Premium ($12):

• Automatic tracking
• Analytics and reports
• FocusTime blocking (basic)
• Mobile tracking

Locu ($12, or $6 with Beta):

• Intentional session tracking
• Focus sessions with full blocking
• Task management
• Time tracking for billing
• Jira/Linear/Slack/Calendar integration
• Work history and insights

Same price point, but Locu adds:

• Task management (RescueTime has none)
• Better blocking (built-in, not add-on)
• Billing-ready exports (RescueTime can't)
• Engineering integrations (RescueTime has none)

---

For Freelancers Specifically

RescueTime's limitation: App-level tracking doesn't help invoicing. You can't bill clients based on "3.2 hours in VS Code." They need task-level detail: "3 hours implementing Feature X, 2 hours fixing Bug Y."

Locu's advantage:

• Task-connected sessions (work on specific client tasks)
• Export invoice-ready timesheets (task details + time + notes)
• Clean billing units (sessions ≈ billable hours)
• Better focus = higher quality = happier clients

For freelancer insights: RescueTime's productivity score doesn't help improve client work. Locu's focused vs unfocused time directly measures execution quality.

---

The Philosophical Question

What do you need?

A) To understand where time currently goes (diagnosis)
B) To structure work for better execution (treatment)

If A → RescueTime provides detailed analysis
If B → Locu provides execution structure

Most people discover: Knowing you wasted 2 hours on Twitter yesterday doesn't prevent wasting 2 hours today. You need structure that makes better execution the default path.

RescueTime assumes willpower will change behavior if you just see the data. Locu assumes willpower is limited—structure beats willpower.

---

The Honest Assessment

RescueTime is excellent at what it does—comprehensive automatic tracking with detailed analytics. If you genuinely want to study your current patterns and are confident you'll change behavior from insights alone, it's one of the best tools available.

But most engineers and freelancers discover: Seeing the problem doesn't fix the problem.

They need:

• Focus sessions (to actually execute)
• Distraction blocking (to prevent problems, not document them)
• Task-level tracking (for billing or meaningful insights)
• Clear work structure (daily rhythm, not sporadic guilt)

RescueTime documents your scattered execution. Locu prevents it through structure.

Passive monitoring shows you're off track. Active structure keeps you on track.

Ready to get things done?

Join makers who ship quality work consistently.

Get Started for Free

No credit card required

10-day free trial