Locu vs Rize: Analysis vs Execution

Rize has perfected automatic time tracking. It monitors everything you do on your computer, categorizes it, and shows you detailed analytics. It's excellent for understanding where your time goes.

But knowing where time went doesn't help you work better.

Locu takes the opposite approach: instead of passively monitoring everything, you intentionally structure your work into focused sessions. Instead of analyzing past behavior, you actively build better execution patterns.

If Rize tells you what happened, Locu helps you do better work.

The Fundamental Difference: Passive vs Active

Passive Tracking Creates Awareness, Not Change

Rize's value proposition: "See where your time goes." It tracks every app, every website, every minute. You get detailed reports showing "3.2 hours in Slack, 2.1 hours in VS Code, 1.8 hours in Chrome."

The problem: Awareness alone rarely changes behavior. You look at the report, feel guilty about Slack time, then... do the same thing tomorrow. Passive tracking doesn't provide the structure to actually improve.

Locu's approach: Active execution structure. Start a focus session, work on one task with distractions blocked, take a break, repeat. The system guides better behavior by design, not by guilt.

Automatic Isn't Always Accurate

Rize tracks app/website time, but it can't read your mind. Is Slack open = working (coordinating with team) or distracted (chatting)? Is browser time = research (productive) or Twitter (procrastination)?

Rize tries to categorize automatically, but you end up recategorizing and adjusting. It's "automatic" but still needs manual work to be accurate.

Locu's approach: You intentionally start sessions and select tasks. The tracking is manual-ish but accurate—you know exactly what you focused on because you chose it. Session gaps make unfocused time obvious. No guessing, no recategorizing.

Analytics Without Action

Rize shows beautiful charts: focus time trends, distraction patterns, productivity scores. Great for analysis. But what do you actually DO with this information?

Most people look at the dashboard, say "huh, interesting," and close it. Without built-in execution structure, insights stay insights—they don't become behavior change.

Locu's approach: Focus AND execution in one system. Start session = immediate distraction blocking. Work on task = full context visible. Regular breaks = built-in sustainability. The structure creates better execution, not just awareness of poor execution.

Privacy & Surveillance Concerns

Rize monitors everything: every app, every website, every idle minute. For personal use, this might be okay (if you're comfortable with it). For team use, it feels like surveillance.

Even personal use has concerns: Do you want everything tracked? Every moment monitored? Some people find it valuable, others find it creepy or stressful.

Locu's approach: Only tracks what you intentionally do in focus sessions. Start session = working. End session = not working. Clear boundaries. No surveillance feeling. You control what's tracked by choosing when to engage.

No Task Connection

Rize shows "2 hours in Jira" but not WHAT you worked on in Jira. You know you spent time in the app, but not which tasks, which issues, what outcomes. For billing clients or reviewing retrospectives, app time isn't enough—you need task-level detail.

Locu's approach: Task-connected sessions. You work on specific tasks during sessions. Your work history shows: "2 hours on Bug #1234, 1.5 hours on Feature #567." Export invoice-ready timesheets with actual task details, not just app names.

Feature Comparison

Feature	Rize	Locu
Automatic tracking	✅ Everything monitored	⚠️ Intentional session start
Focus sessions	❌	✅ Full session structure
App/website blocking	❌	✅ Active distraction blocking
Task management	❌	✅ Full prioritization
Task-level tracking	❌	✅ Precise per-task time
Work history	⚠️ App/website timeline	✅ Task-based timeline
Daily planning	❌	✅ Morning priority ritual
Daily shutdown	❌	✅ Evening closure ritual
Analytics	✅ Extensive	⚠️ Focus quality metrics
Client timesheets	❌	✅ Invoice-ready export
Jira integration	❌	✅ Full bidirectional sync
Linear integration	❌	✅ Full sync
Slack integration	⚠️ Tracked as distraction	✅ DND + status control
Privacy	⚠️ Everything monitored	✅ Only sessions tracked
Behavior change	⚠️ Awareness only	✅ Built-in structure
Pricing	$9.99/mo	$12/mo ($6 Beta)

When to Choose Rize

✅ You want to understand where time currently goes (diagnosis)
✅ You don't need active focus structure or session discipline
✅ You're comfortable with everything being monitored
✅ You want extensive analytics and charts
✅ You're self-directed enough to change behavior from insights alone
✅ You don't need task-level tracking or integrations

Rize excels at showing you the problem. It doesn't help you solve it.

When to Choose Locu

✅ You want to actively work better, not just analyze past work
✅ You need focus structure (sessions, breaks, distraction blocking)
✅ You prefer intentional tracking over passive surveillance
✅ You need task-level detail for billing or retrospectives
✅ You work in Jira/Linear and need integration
✅ You want execution structure, not just awareness
✅ Privacy matters—only track what you choose to focus on

Locu helps you execute better by design.

The Real Difference: Diagnosis vs Treatment

Rize's philosophy: Track everything. Show where time goes. Create awareness through analytics.

Locu's philosophy: Structure your work intentionally. Focus sessions + task selection + regular breaks = better execution by design.

It's like the difference between:

A fitness tracker (Rize) that shows you walked 3,000 steps today
A workout program (Locu) that structures your exercise and builds better habits

Both are valuable, but they serve different purposes:

Rize is for people who want to understand their current behavior
Locu is for people who want to build better execution patterns

Can You Use Both?

Technically yes, but probably not worth it:

Rize would show: "4 hours in VS Code, 2 hours in Slack, 1 hour in Chrome"
Locu would show: "3 focused sessions on Feature #1234, 1 session on Bug #567, 30 min unfocused"

Rize's data is more granular (every app switch) but less actionable (what were you actually accomplishing?). Locu's data is more meaningful (task outcomes) even if less granular (session-level).

Most users find they don't need both. If you want to improve execution, Locu's intentional structure is more valuable than Rize's passive monitoring.

Switching from Rize

What you'll keep:

Awareness of focus vs distraction patterns
Understanding that tracking helps improvement
Data-driven approach to productivity

What you'll change:

From passive monitoring → active session structure
From "seeing the problem" → "building better patterns"
From app-level tracking → task-level tracking
From surveillance feeling → intentional boundaries

What you'll gain:

Daily planning ritual (start with clarity)
Focus sessions with active blocking (not just monitoring distractions)
Task-connected work history (what you accomplished, not just where time went)
Jira/Linear/Slack integrations
Daily shutdown ritual (clear boundaries)

What you might miss:

Automatic tracking (everything captured without thinking)
Super granular analytics (every app, every minute)
Background monitoring (no conscious engagement needed)

Migration process:

Review final Rize reports to understand current patterns
Set up Locu integrations (Jira, Linear, Calendar, Slack)
First morning planning (prioritize tasks consciously)
First focus session (experience active structure vs passive monitoring)
First evening shutdown (compare task-based review vs app-based analytics)

Setup time: 15 minutes
Learning curve: 1 week to build intentional session habit

Pricing Comparison

Rize: $9.99/month
Locu: $12/month or $6/month (Beta discount)

The value difference:

Rize at $10/month: Automatic tracking + analytics dashboards
Locu at $6/month (Beta): Intentional structure + focus sessions + task tracking + integrations

If you're also running:

A focus timer: $0-10/month
Task manager (Jira/Linear/Todoist): (already have)
Total with Rize: $10-20/month

Replace with Locu: $12/month ($6 with Beta)
Comparable cost, but active execution vs passive monitoring

For Freelancers Specifically

Rize's limitation: App-level tracking doesn't help with invoicing. You can't send clients a report saying "4.2 hours in VS Code, 1.8 hours in Figma." They need to know: "4 hours on Homepage Redesign task, 2 hours on Bug Fixes."

Locu's advantage:

Task-connected sessions (work on specific client tasks)
Export invoice-ready timesheets (task details + time + notes)
Clean billing units (sessions map to billable hours)
Better focus structure = higher quality deliverables = happier clients

For personal insights: Locu's "focused vs unfocused" ratio tells you execution quality. Rize tells you app usage. For freelancers, execution quality is more valuable than app analytics.

The Philosophical Question

Do you want to:

A) Know exactly where your time went yesterday (passive awareness)
B) Structure your work to execute better today (active improvement)

If A → Rize might be interesting for analysis
If B → Locu provides the structure you need

Most people who try automatic tracking tools (Rize, RescueTime, etc.) eventually realize: Seeing the problem doesn't fix the problem. You need structure to change behavior.

Locu builds that structure into your daily workflow: Plan → Focus → Shutdown. The tracking is a byproduct of better execution, not the goal itself.

The Honest Assessment

Rize is excellent at what it does—comprehensive automatic tracking with beautiful analytics. If you want to study your computer usage patterns in detail, it's one of the best tools available.

But most engineers and freelancers don't need to study their patterns—they need to improve their execution. They need:

Focus sessions (to actually work deeply)
Distraction blocking (to protect that focus)
Task-level tracking (to understand what got done)
Clear work boundaries (to prevent burnout)

Rize gives you analytics. Locu gives you a system.

Automatic tracking is good for analysis. Intentional structure is better for execution.

Ready to get things done?

Join makers who ship quality work consistently.

Get Started for Free

No credit card required

10-day free trial